North Shore Backs Sunken Gardens
By Timothy J. Baker
THE NSNA AT its February meeting voted to donate $1,000 to the Save Sunken Gardens committee.
Save Sunken Gardens (SSG) is a newly formed political action committee that wants city voters to approve a March ballot question that would allow a public purchase of the 4th Street tourist attraction.
Specifically, voters will be asked on March 23 to give the City Council the authority to purchase Sunken Gardens, and to levy a one-time tax of up to 50 mills to help finance the purchase. No actual purchase price is named, and the council would not actually be required to make the purchase.
The proposed one-time tax would cost the owner of a $150,000 home about $45, assuming that the property was assessed at about $75,000 and that the owner qualified for a homestead exemption.
The NSNA vote to donate money to the SSG committee came after a lively debate, during which questions were raised about whether North Shore should be associated with a political action committee, about the size of the donation relative to the association's bank account of about $10,000, and about whether the association should support a new tax on homeowners.
In the end, though, support for the gardens clearly outweighed the objections: the vote was 51 in favor of the $1,000 donation and 4 against.
THE DRIVE TO put the Sunken Gardens question on the ballot was led by Lane Lastinger, a former president and current board member of the North Shore Neighborhood Association. He also formed the SSG committee, and in that capacity asked the NSNA for the donation.
It was during Mr. Lastinger's tenure as NSNA president in 1998 that Sunken Gardens was named a local historic landmark, giving the facility some protection against redevelopment. The NSNA was the official applicant for the landmark status.
The landmark status was opposed by the Turner family, which owns Sunken Gardens. They have been attempting to sell the property for the past ten years, and at the time of the landmarking had a contract to sell to a development company that proposed to build townhouses on the site.
That contract fell through after the landmark status was approved. A second contract fell through shortly after that.
Although the landmark status may have been the cause of the first contract's failure, it was not relevant to the second contract. Also, the family's efforts to sell began a decade before the landmarking.
THE TENUOUS STATUS of Sunken Gardens led Mr. Lastinger to request that the City Council ask the voters to approve a possible purchase of the facility. At first, the council voted against putting a referendum on the ballot. Later, the council reversed course and agreed to the referendum.
The reversal came after officials of Lowry Park Zoo in Tampa suggested that they might operate Sunken Gardens as an ancillary zoo if the city would purchase the property.
Council members Jay Lasita and Bill Foster attended the NSNA meeting and answered questions about the proposal. Also attending the NSNA meeting was council member Bob Kersteen, who made the motion at Council to put the question on the ballot.
Both Lasita and Foster said they would not want the city itself to operate Sunken Gardens, but would instead prefer that a third party such as Lowry Park be involved. If an agreement with Lowry Park could not be reached, they said, other proposals would be considered.
Return to NSNA Home Page | Return to Archives |